Choices and Consequence...an Opinion

Dec 17, 2007,04:50 AM
 

Choices

I prefer the Chopard version even though it has a larger (sic) series of 100 pieces.

The Sincere LE ruthenium coating degrades the appreciation of the fine finishing that LUC does.

The Chopard version dial is also more elegant and without the redundant cut-out on the right side @ 3 o'clock that distracts from the 'star of the show' - the tourbillon and sapphire bridge.

 

Consequences

This is a more subtle discussion and about the strategy of making Ltd Edn repeatedly with one dealer. It is understandable to make a LE to commemorate or celebrate an event e.g. 30th anniversary of the dealer's foundation or number of years partnership between a manufacture and it's dealer e.g. Patek Philippe and Tiffany & Co.

But, what are the consequences of annual issues of "limited editions" with the same dealer? Of course, that one dealer may be able to sell all it's LE pieces but maybe at the expense of sacrificing sales from the regular production.

For a small island like Singapore, the allocation of 18 pieces of a tourbillon takes away 20% of the production capacity for the 100 piece "standard" version for the world. It is actually more effort to make a small run of LE because it is different (albeit small differences in dial and the coating they slap on the movement).

There are...say...300 dealers globally, so even assuming Sincere gets a preferred dealer alllocation of 20% of the standard production i.e. 20 pieces, that leaves 80 pieces for the rest-of-the-world.

If there is no 'preferred allocation' status, then, there is 1:3 chance for a dealer to get a standard SLT, and assuming that Sincere 'outlucks' 2 other dealers for that 1 allocated watch, that means that the "limited edition" SLT actually outnumbers the standard SLT by 18:1.....not that limited after all. I'd like to be THAT one person owning that single standard SLT in Singapore rather than the 'common' Sincere version smile

I can understand Sincere wanting to make "Ltd Edn" because it guarantees them allocation of at least a fifth of the LUC production in a "desirable" colour of movement. There is no risk because more than half are "pre-sold"....as local people who collected previous ruthenium coloured movements will want to add to their hoard. The rest can be delivered anywhere in the world for those that "Must Have" every "Ltd Edn" or who can't get their standard production watches e.g. if a customer in Thailand cannot get a standard SLT because the 1 watch allocated to his country was sold, it's easier to get some sort of SLT from Sincere in Singapore.

Conclusion:

PuristS: Passion. Opinion. Information.

Limited Editions make business sense in current hot market conditions, as long as you...dear reader....continue to feed it's flames by talking about them and buying them smile

Regards,

MTF

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Side By Side Comparison Of 2 Versions Of L.U.C Tourbillon SL

 
 By: Kong : December 14th, 2007-06:11
This post introduces the Chopard's version and follow by a side-by-side comparison of the two SLs, the Chopard's ( limited to 100 pcs) and the Sincere's ( limited to 18 pcs) versions. SL ( Chopard's Version of Limited 100 pcs) The Name is SL, Super Light....  

Do I have to choose either one?

 
 By: AnthonyTsai : December 16th, 2007-20:12
If not, I would like to create my own version For the dial, I actually prefer Sincere's. I like the contrast between the silver and the ruthenium. For the movement, I prefer the standard look of Chopard's. I was never a fan of a ruthenium finished movemen... 

Choices and Consequence...an Opinion

 
 By: MTF : December 17th, 2007-04:50
Choices I prefer the Chopard version even though it has a larger (sic) series of 100 pieces. The Sincere LE ruthenium coating degrades the appreciation of the fine finishing that LUC does. The Chopard version dial is also more elegant and without the redu... 

Great inputs, thanks MTF...

 
 By: Kong : December 19th, 2007-11:40
...