CaliforniaJed[Purist]
5145
L.U.C 1937 On the Wrist Review
Aug 24, 2014,10:56 AM
L.U.C 1937 On the Wrist Review
Several weeks ago I came across an L.U.C 1937 in stainless steel that yearned to be on my wrist. Okay, truth told, it was all our friend Daos’ fault — she made me buy it! (She has these powers — it is true!)
Mine, as I said, is in Stainless Steel, with a satin-brushed silver dial with a very nice sunburst pattern. In addition to the satin-brushed dial, in 2011 Chopard also made available a white lacquer dial as well. Kong wrote a nice summary of the two models released in 2011 here:
The 1937 can now be had in 18-karat Rose Gold as well. In either metal a bracelet is available.
Mine is on an black, large scale alligator strap that is beautifully lined with rust-brown, small scale alligator. It is both beautiful and supple, but with ample thickness. The buckle is nicely finished and bears the L.U.C mark.
DIAL: The dial is adorned with Chopard’s now familiar bold Roman numerals, no radial flip, with a somewhat “squished” VI to accommodate the date window just above. Perhaps the most polarizing feature of this (and other) Chopard watches, some dislike the squished VI, and some dislike the presence of a date complication at all. While I stand with those who believe a dial is cleanest without the interruption of a date window, I must admit that I do enjoy the utility of the complication, and I find the presence at 6:00 to be the least obtrusive.
My favorite element of the dial is the satin-brushed texture. Note how the “sunburst” seems to originate beneath the L.U. Chopard mark on the dial. That’s a nice touch. (Daos actually caught this before I did!)
HANDS: I wish I knew what to call them? I am going to refer to them as “modified dauphine” unless someone else can educate me as to a more appropriate desciptor. They may be a bit avant guard, but Chopard has been using them for sometime and it this point they are somewhat a signature element. I enjoy them, particularly the luminous material that runs in a band down the middle.
EDIT NOTE: Per MTF's post below, Chopard calls these hands "Dauphine Fusee".
CASE: The case is large, beefy in fact, at 42mm, with medium length, thick lugs. It works on this watch. The sides of the case are brushed, the balance polished.CROWN: A nice, large crown, adorned with the L.U.C mark. Very pleasant to the touch.
MOVEMENT: Here is where most agree Chopard shines, and the 1937 is no exception. Inside the 1937 beats the Chopard Cal. L.U.C 01.01-L, a 4hz automatic movement, Chronometer certified. This was the first movement manufactured by the Fleurier Ebauche.The movement design, with the rotor spinning around a central axis, is a departure from the micro rotor movements that power most of the automatic L.U.C models. The power reserve is rated at 60 hours, a feature I appreciate.
The finishing is quite nice, I think, particularly given the (relatively) modest price of the 1937 in stainless steel.
So how does it wear? Very nicely! I was concerned to a degree, as my tastes have evolved toward more modest case sizes, but the 42mm case of the 1937 has not been overwhelming, and is quite comfortable, no doubt aided by the suppleness of the strap supplied with it. At 10.64mm thick, the case is by no means thin, but I have not found it at all clunky, either.
Complaints? None yet. It has been very accurate, deviating a second or two a day in my non-scientific observation. Some may have a hard time with the design of this watch. It defies placement into a familiar category; the 1937 is not a marine chronometer, nor is it a sport watch, nor a delicate thing. It not particularly historic in design, as an automatic with a date window at 6, nor is it modern, with rather traditional Roman numerals. Then again, those hands have a bit of a modern flare. (Funny enough, I just checked the Chopard website to see how they describe the design. In their words, “Passion, tradition and innovation combine in the L.U.C 1937 classic timepiece.” I agree! In the end, it is its own thing, and I like that — quite a bit, actually.
Best,
CaliforniaJed
This message has been edited by MTF on 2014-08-25 15:37:55 This message has been edited by CaliforniaJed on 2014-08-25 20:36:01