Chopard L.U.C 1937 Classic - "On-the-Wrist" Review

Feb 29, 2012,22:17 PM
 

If intellectualism, distinctiveness, refinement and tribute could be made into a watch, the Chopard L.U.C. 1937 Classic would be the resulting product.  Reflecting vintage elegance and conventionalism with a hint of modern design, this watch could easily be the wrist companion of a book-smart, Thomas Pink sporting reader of the New York Times.  Although to limit the look to this stereotype would be greatly undermining its technical ingenuity and historical appeal which have a way of resonating in the tastes and appreciation of just about any watch enthusiast.

 

Chopard L.U.C 1937 Classic Watch

 

An "On-the-Wrist" Review

 

By Ping Tsai

 

© October 2011

 


 

 

A Limited Edition of the L.U.C. 1937 was released at Baselworld 2010 to commemorate Chopard's 150 year anniversary.  It was a "mechanical tribute to the manufacture's watchmaking heritage."  With the many events and decisive moments that have punctuated Chopard's long standing history, 1937, also the chosen name for the watch, was a particularly significant year for the company.  It was the year that the founder's grandson, Paul-André Chopard chose to leave the Swiss Jura region where Louis-Ulysse Chopard set up his first workshop in the town of Sonvilier, in order to establish the brand in Geneva.  A staff of 150 employees worked under André Chopard, crafting precision mechanical wristwatches that would set the tone for the following years.  It was in the subsequent period of Chopard's history that the brand built its current success, attracting customers from Scandinavia and Eastern Europe including Russia. 

 

Case and Dial

 

When I first saw the Chopard L.U.C. 1937 Classic, first from a photo and later in person, I found the most striking thing about the watch to be the clean white dial.  From a personal perspective, it is the single most attractive feature of the watch.  Bright white dials are classic and always seem to stand out, especially when accompanied by dark black numeral markers – and the 1937 has quite distinctive ones.  Thick black roman numerals, which are a signature design element of many of the L.U.C. models along with the minute-track serve as the indicators on the dial. The vivid color contrast somehow has the illusion of causing the numbers to jump off the dial.  Differences in finishing also serve to further provide a three-dimensional quality to the numerals.  The typeface along with the minute markers are printed as opposed to applied on the dial and have a glossy finish, giving them an embossed effect and contrasting nicely with the smooth, matte dial.  Although one might mistake the dial to be white enamel, it is actually made of lacquer.  The clean porcelain-like surface is a much better choice as opposed to enamel because of its uniformity and the complimentary backdrop it provides to the shiny black markers.  The watch is also available with a satin-brushed silver dial and polished rhodium plated numerals.  The numerals on the silver version are applied and the minute track is transferred. 

 


 

 



 

 

The white of the dial is a strong feature about the watch.  However, it is also a drawback due to its size.  There is a lot of empty space on the dial.  On a relatively large face, the whiteness becomes more pronounced.  The overall aesthetic of the dial would have been proportionally more balanced and harmonious if the case/dial of the watch was slightly smaller.  In my opinion, 39 or 40mm would have been ideal for the look.  Consequentially, the thickness of the numerals would have to be adjusted too.  Perhaps the watch designers at Chopard were going for a bolder overall look which they did achieve.  The slightly smaller proportions would make for an attractive ladies version of the model.  Just as male counterparts, although handsome, can be large and clumsy, females, who are often scaled down, are likely more pleasant to look at. 

 



 

 

The original 1937 that was launched in 2010 had a darker brushed slate-gray dial and silver markers and differed additionally with a red second hand.  Chopard took a more neutral approach in the latest version of the watch opting to replace the red second hand with a silver one.  Although I personally like the minimal red detail on the original, I think eliminating it was a smart move on their part.  Not everyone likes color on their watches and not everyone likes red.  It can be difficult to match so a monotone approach was a safer option for mass appeal.  The black Dauphine minute and hour hands of the watch are specialized for the L.U.C. collection.  The superluminova fill on the minute and hour hands has an outlining and lightening effect as it extends out towards the edge of the dial.  However, this also leaves the central part of the dial somewhat dark.  The second hand adds to the business.  It is long and thin with a graceful sweeping motion around the circumference of the dial.  However, the other end of the hand is short and considerably thicker.  As pointed out previously by Kong, "If the counter-weight of the moving center-second Dauphine could be redesigned smaller, it would be perfect and less cluttered in the central area."  A very subtle date display window that sits at 6 o'clock completes the elegant look of the dial.

 


 
 

 


 

 

The 42 mm-diameter steel case of the L.U.C. 1937 features a classic round case with curved lugs and a screw-down crown at 3 o'clock that offers a stop-seconds function enabling easy and accurate time-setting and water resistance to 50m.  The original version had a slightly more "innovative profile", sporting the crown at 4 o'clock.  The case is not over-sized yet it is certainly larger than watches that were available in 1937 and several decades after that.  42mm is a good bridge between a classical and a contemporary watch.  The sides of the case have a vertical satin-brushed finish and the top and bottom surfaces of the lugs and caseback are polished.  This variation of finishes on the different surfaces gives the watch a more dynamic aesthetic.  An interesting side profile view shows the brushed metal strip of the case sandwiched between the two polished surfaces of the bezel and caseback.  The sapphire crystal is double anti-reflective coated providing exceptional clarity to the dial.  The case has substantial weight when held in the palm of one's hand.  The design is pretty simple and straightforward with little frills yet it is evident that the highest quality of construction was employed. 

 


 


 

 

 

Movement

The L.U.C 1937 Classic model is fitted with the new L.U.C Calibre 1.010.  The mechanical self-winding movement is visible through the sapphire crystal caseback and beats at 28,800 vibrations per hour.  The Calibre 1.010 is chronometer-certified by the COSC and has a 60-hour power reserve, enough to make it through the weekend without wear.  The rotor doesn't swing around continuously but rather from one angle to another with each shake of the watch.  A pleasant design detail is the skeletonized rotor.  It allows for optimal visibility of the movement with bridges that are elegantly finished with Côtes de Gèneve.  Designed to be highly reliable, it powers the hour, minute, second and date functions of the watch.  The brand claims that, "The precise and high-performance L.U.C Calibre 1.010 represents a significant landmark in the history of L.U.C movements, since its construction serves to increase production volumes and thus consolidate Chopard's independence."

Without a doubt, the L.U.C 1937 Classic is the most accurate and high-performing watch that I have reviewed to date.  There were times when I left the watch sitting for a day or two without wear and it would still display the correct time.  The time was always accurate to the minute. 

 


 

 


 

 

Strap and Fit

The L.U.C 1937 Classic watch is fitted with a black alligator leather strap lined with brown alligator leather and secured by a steel Ardillon buckle.  I was surprised to see that the lining of the strap is alligator too.  It is indicative of Chopard's adherence and dedication to delivering the highest quality product possible.  Fit and comfort are where the 1937 falls slightly short.  According to male testimony, this watch "isn't the most comfortable to wear."  Some of the edges along the side of the case are a little sharp.  Especially areas like the bottom edges of the lugs have a tendency to dig into the skin during wear.  Smoothing or rounding out some of these edges would make the watch much more comfortable to wear.

 


 

 


 

 

 

 

Sometimes when a truly well made timepiece is stripped down to its purest forms, the true essence of mechanical watches can be experienced and enjoyed.  Watches these days often have so many additives that detract from the heart and soul of what it really is.  These may be fancy cases, gemstones, overly designed dials or exotic materials.  The L.U.C. 1937 Classic is a watch that captures all that is great and beautiful about timepieces in their simplest forms.  A minimalist uncluttered dial, simple time, date functions, a round case and standard crown, and a movement that does what movements are supposed to do and that is to work well and work efficiently – those are the unassuming highlights of the L.U.C 1937 Classic but are what comprise a truly great watch for anyone to own.

 


 



 





 





 

 

This message has been edited by AnthonyTsai on 2012-03-02 10:45:41 This message has been edited by MTF on 2012-03-09 09:38:22

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Very Elegant Watch...

 
 By: SALMANPK : March 1st, 2012-00:34
I prefer this to any Patek or Vacheron any day, just a gorgeous and lovely watch and I love the inner lining of the strap. Thanks for the great review. S

Thank you!

 
 By: pingtsai : March 4th, 2012-10:55
The inside of the strap is a nice detail. I would think that it was unnecessary but a lot of things for luxury are not necessary. I like the subtlety of it.

Warm and elegant

 
 By: E.S : March 1st, 2012-01:45
I still find Chopard is a under value brand for its technical achievement and quality, best, Ed

I'm sure the folks at Chopard...

 
 By: pingtsai : March 4th, 2012-11:00
....are quite pleased to receive this comment from you. I would have to agree with you.

Superb article, Ping. As always, superbly written.

 
 By: amanico : March 1st, 2012-11:38
I would have preferred having a manual wound movement, but I can live with tis automatic calibre. No, the biggest issue, for me, is the date, which ruins the dial, with this eaten 6. And a true enamel dial would have been more in my taste. My personal opi... 

Happy to have been read by you :)

 
 By: pingtsai : March 4th, 2012-11:04
Thank you! The points that you speak of - an enamel dial, presence of date, and manual wind movement would have made the watch a true true classic - which is always stunning and beautiful imo . I guess they were going for modernized classic, lol. Thanks a... 

Nice review, and good observations about the comfort

 
 By: cazalea : March 1st, 2012-11:49
I've had a couple watches with similar sharp edges on the underside (a GP stands out in my mind). I've wondered if they (the watch people) don't notice, appreciate or consider that as a detraction from their work. It's a needless problem to interpose on t... 

Comfort of the 1937

 
 By: pingtsai : March 4th, 2012-11:14
It's one of those things that isn't immediately evident so i can see how it can be overlooked. But I'm sure that they test wear their prototypes. Perhaps they think that it isn't that noticeable or that important. However, for me, it's very important and ... 

Great post.....

 
 By: JMan : March 1st, 2012-11:52
I think you have hit on the problem with the look of this watch. Thick markers, dark central area that makes the beautiful white dial feel like it has a vast open space. But I like the movement side very much. Thanks for a great review! J.

Thank you for your comments! [nt]

 
 By: pingtsai : March 4th, 2012-11:15
No message body

Thanks a lot Ping for this great article.

 
 By: foversta : March 1st, 2012-12:10
I know both versions of the watch and I really like the grey dial one. I regret the presence of the date on the dial of the white one. I think that the hands work better with the grey dial. Thanks Ping! Fx

Thank you...

 
 By: pingtsai : March 4th, 2012-11:17
....for providing some good points between the two versions.

Thanks Ping ...

 
 By: Kong : March 5th, 2012-09:04
it is nice to have the perspective from a lady watch maven. I hope Chopard received the constructive feedback of the uncomfortable sharp edges digging in after prolong wearing. I hope it is not a side-effect of the oversize case which is hefty thus the ow... 

Wonderful read, Ping

 
 By: AlexSunrise : March 6th, 2012-09:15
Thank you for having taken the time to express us your take on this Chopard, and not to mention your great photos as well. I had a chance to try it on a couple of days ago, and like you, my impressions regarding size also came afloat. A looker on the case...